Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

JUDUL ARTIKEL DITULIS MAKSIMAL 20 KATA,

DITULIS DALAM BAHASA INDONESIA DIKETIK DENGAN HURUF TIMES NEW ROMAN, 12 CETAK TEBAL

 Ketik abstrak dalam bahasa Indonesia yang terdiri dari satu alinea, tidak boleh lebih dari 200 kata, tanpa acuan (referensi) tanpa singkatan/akronim, dan tanpa footnote. Abstrak ditulis bukan dalam bentuk matematis, pertanyaan, dan dugaan. Abstrak harus memuat pendahuluan, metode, hasil dan pembahasan, dan kesimpulan serta saran. Kecuali jika artikel berupa kajian atau review dapat

disesuaikan. Diketik dengan font Times New Roman 11, spasi tunggal, dan dicetak miring.

 

Kata Kunci: Maksimum 5 kata, katakunci satu, katakunci dua dst [Font Times New Roman 11 spasi tunggal, dan cetak miring]

 

ABSTRACT

Ketik abstrak dalam bahasa Inggris yang terdiri dari satu alinea, tidak boleh lebih dari 200 kata, tanpa acuan (referensi) tanpa singkatan/akronim, dan tanpa footnote. Abstrak ditulis bukan dalam

bentuk matematis, pertanyaan, dan dugaan. Abstrak harus memuat pendahuluan, metode, hasil dan

pembahasan, dan kesimpulan serta saran. Kecuali jika artikel berupa kajian atau review dapat disesuaikan. Diketik dengan font Times New Roman 11, spasi tunggal, dan dicetak miring.

 

Keywords: Maksimal 5 Keywords, Keywords satu, Keywords dua; Keywords tiga, dst. [Font Times New

Roman 11 spasi tunggal, dan cetak miring]

 

PENDAHULUAN

Pendahuluan   diketik   dengan    huruf besar [font Times New Roman 12 bold] berisi

latar belakang mengatasi suatu permasalahan, urgensi,   rasionalisasi   kegiatan,   dan   kajian

literatur  yang  digunakan  sebagai  dasar penelitian    yang    dilakukan,    permasalahan

penelitian atau hipotesis. Jika artikel berupa kajian atau review cukup menampilkan permasalahan, kerangka kerja analisis, dan sub-

sub judul yang dapat disesuaikan dengan isi kajian atau review yang dilakukan. Di bagian

akhir pendahuluan dapat pula dituliskan tujuan penulisan artikel, tinjauan pustaka, rencana pemecahan   masalah,   tujuan   kegiatan,   dan

pengembangan hipotesis.

 

Catatan  untuk penulis:  Panjang artikel  antara

3000-4000  kata  (termasuk  kepustakaan, catatan-catatan, dan tabel). Setiap artikel akan diuji keplagiatan/jiplak

Artikel diketik dengan format Microsoft Office

Word  dengan  menggunakan  font Times  New

Roman ukuran 11, spasi tunggal di kertas A4,

Format kertas 3-3-2-2 ( kiri-atas-kanan-bawah). Jumlah halaman antara maksimal 15 halaman. Penulis dapat mengirimkan dan mendaftarkan artikel melalui online OJS Jurnal Keperawatan dihalaman website: http://jurnal.stikeskendal.ac.id/index.php/keperawatan.

METODE

Metode diketik dengan huruf besar [font Times New Roman 12 bold]. Metode penelitian menjelaskan     tentang:     pendekatan,     ruang

lingkup atau objek, definisi operasional variable/deskripsi   fokus   penelitian,   tempat,

populasi dan sampel/informan, bahan dan alat utama,  teknik  pengumpulan  data,  dan  teknik

analisis data. Pengukuran variabel yang dibuat dalam  bentuk  paragraf  mengalir  dan  tidak

dibuat    numbering.    Simbol-simbol    statistik

menggunakan simbol-simbol dan istilah standar misalnya t-test bukan t-hitung. [Times New Roman, 11, normal, spasi tunggal] 

HASIL

Hasil diketik dengan huruf besar [font Times

New Roman 12 bold]. Hasil penelitian disajikan dengan   lengkap   dan   sesuai   ruang   lingkup

penelitian.  Hasil  penelitian  dapat  dilengkapi

dengan tabel, grafik (gambar), dan/atau bagan. Tabel dan gambar diberi nomor dan judul. Hasil analisis  data  dimaknai  dengan  benar.  [Times New Roman, 11, normal, spasi tunggal]

 

PEMBAHASAN

Pembahasan diketik dengan huruf besar [font

Times  New  Roman  12  bold].  Bagian pembahasan    memaparkan    hasil    penemuan

secara  logis,  mengaitkan  dengan  sumber rujukan    yang    relevan.    Pembahasan    hasil

bersifat argumentatif menyangkut relevansi antara  hasil,  teori,  penelitian  terdahulu  dan

fakta empiris yang ditemukan, serta menunjukkan kebaruan temuan. [Times New Roman, 11, normal, spasi tunggal]

 

SIMPULAN 

Simpulan diketik dengan huruf besar

[font Times New Roman 12 bold]. Simpulan berisi rangkuman singkat atas hasil penelitian dan

pembahasan yang ditulis dalam satu atau dua

paragraf. Simpulan adalah temuan penelitian yang berupa jawaban atas pertanyaan peneitian atau tujuan penelitian, ditulis dalam bentuk esai, tidak dalam kalimat statistik. [Times New Roman, 11, normal, spasi tunggal]

 

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Memuat   sumber-sumber   yang   dirujuk   dan

minimal 80% berupa pustaka terbitan 10 tahun terakhir.  Daftar  rujukan  ditulis  sesuai  dengan

American  Psychological  Association  (APA)  6th

Edition.. Semua sumber yang tercantum dalam daftar pustaka harus ada dalam naskah artikel.

 

Penulisan naskah dan situasi yang diacu dalam naskah ini disarankan menggunakan aplikasi referensi  (reference  manager)  seperti Mendeley,  Zotero,  Reffwork,  Endnote     dan lain-lain. [Times New Roman, 11, normal, spasi tunggal]. Berikut beberapa contoh penulisan daftar pustaka:

 

 

Albert, C., & Garcı´a-Serrano, C. (2010).

Cleaning the slate? School choice and educational outcomes in Spain. High Educ, 559–582. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9315-

9

 

Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2013). Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work. (2, Ed.)John Wiley & Sons (2nd ed., Vol.

53). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97811074153

24.004

 

Heppner, P. P., Wampold, B. E., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2008). Research Design in Counseling, Third Edition. Belmont: Thomson Higher Education.

 

Wampold, B. E., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2008).

Research Design in Counseling, Third Edition. Belmont: Thomson Higher Education.

 

- Selamat Menulis -

 

Sekretariat Redaksi Jurnal Ilmiah Permas: Jurnal Ilmiah STIKES Kendal

Alamat: STIKES Kendal Jl. Laut No. 31 Kendal Jawa Tengah 51311. Telp (0294) 381343, Fax (0294)

381343

e-mail :  lppm.stikeskendal@gmail.com http://jurnal.stikeskendal.ac.id/index.php/keperawatan

 

 

 

 

Editorial

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Keperawatan menerbitkan artikel-artikel yang merupakan hasil penelitian, studi kasus, hasil studi literatur, konsep keilmuan, pengetahuan dan teknologi yang inovatif dan terbaharu dalam lingkup keperawatan yang berfokus pada (10) pilar keperawatan, meliputi: keperawatan anak; keperawatan maternitas; keperawatan medikal-bedah; keperawatan kritis; keperawatan gawat darurat; keperawatan jiwa; keperawatan komunitas; keperawatan gerontik; keperawatan keluarga; dan kepemimpinan dan manajemen keperawatan.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow focus and scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection softaware to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software.

The research article submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript.

Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issue.

 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

Our Publication Ethics are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards: Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Author should not in general submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced
Acknowledgement of Sources: Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
Authorship of the Paper: The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgement section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should clearly disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: The author should clearly identify in the manuscript if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use.

Duties of Editor

Publication Decisions: Based on the review report of the editorial board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editors have to take responsibility for everything they publish and should have procedures and policies in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish and maintain the integrity of the published record.
Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.
Fair Play: The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors. An important part of the responsibility to make fair and unbiased decisions is the upholding of the principle of editorial independence and integrity. Editors are in a powerful position by making decisions on publications, which makes it very important that this process is as fair and unbiased as possible.
Confidentiality: The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential. Editors should critically assess any potential breaches of data protection and patient confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor of the Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his own research without written consent of the author. Editors should not be involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest

Duties of Reviewers

Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.

 

 

Abstracting & Indexing

 

  1. Google Scholar

 

 

Policy of Screening for Plagiarism

 

All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection softaware to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.